Версия для печати

Необходимость гармонизации гигиенических нормативов пестицидов в пищевых продуктах на этапе евроинтеграции Украины (на примере фунгицидов) (на английском языке)

  • Авторы: А.Н. Антоненко, Е.П. Вавриневич, В.Г. Бардов, С.А. Омельчук
Скачать вложения:

Институт гигиены и экологии Национального медицинского университета имени А.А. Богомольца, г. Киев, Украина

Резюме. В работе приведены результаты сравнительной оценки нормативной базы Украины по безопасному содержанию фунгицидов в пищевых продуктах с нормативными базами других стран мира: США, Япония, Канада, страны Европы и установлены расхождения, указаны их причины и предложены возможные пути решения проблемы гармонизации нормативной базы Украины с международными стандартами.
Ключевые слова: максимально допустимые уровни, гармонизация, фунгициды, международные стандарты.

At present time in Ukraine adaptation and harmonization of the regulatory framework in the field of agriculture to the international standards are quite actively developing [1, 2]. Such policy provides euro integration of Ukraine and simplifies the conditions of export of agricultural products. To integrate into the internal market of the European Union (EU), Ukraine should focus on European requirements, since the main barriers to trade with the EU lies in the requirements for safety and quality of products, its characteristics, conformity assessment procedures with the technical requirements [3, 4].

Today in Ukraine 400 values of acceptable daily doses (ADD) and ten times more of maximum allowable levels (MAL) values of pesticides are approved. With a quarter of them (more than 100 values of ADD) are fungicides. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze compliance with hygienic standards and regulations of fungicides in food that occupy a leading position according to their assortment and volume of application in Ukraine and other countries among all preparations for crops protection.

In addition, this class of pesticides used mainly two-, three times during the crops’ growing season. Such conditions of application can lead to fungicides accumulation in agricultural raw materials [5].

The aim of work was a comparative assessment of the Ukrainian regulatory framework of safe pesticides contents in food stuffs with the regulatory bases of other countries: the US, Japan, Canada, European countries for establishing of fundamental differences, their causes and possible ways of solving the problem.

Materials and methods. We have conducted a comparative estimation of value of ADD and ADI (acceptable daily intakes), MAL and MRL in the agricultural production of the most common and widely used pesticides in the world: triazoles (difenoconazole, tebu-conazole, flutriafol); methoxyacrylates (pyraclostrobin, trifloxystrobin, azoxystrobin); cyanopyrrole (boscalid, metalaxyl-M); anilinopyrimidines (cyprodinil, pyrimethanil); pyrazolecarboxamides (fluxapyroxad, penthiopyrad, isopyrazam, sedaxan) [6–11].

Also the most common (both for domestic use and for export) cultures were selected [12, 13]: cereals (wheat and corn/maize), vegetables (potatoes, tomatoes), garden fruits (apples, grapes), pulses (soybeans, peas). In addition, corn and soybeans are related to oilseeds.

The values of ADD and MAL in food products, approved in Ukraine are given from DSanPiN 8.8.1.2.3.4.- 000-2001 [14–16]. Also data bases of Europe [6], Japan [7], Canada [8] and Codex Alimentarius [9] were used.

Results and discussion. The results of comparative analysis showed that 47 % of the test substances, ADD values that are approved in Ukraine, coincide with the values of acceptable daily intakes (ADI), substantiated by experts of FAO/WHO, USA, Japan (table 1). In all other cases the value of ADD, which was approved in Ukraine, much lower than values, established in other countries.

Table 1. Acceptable daily doses and maximum residue levels of different classes of fungicides in agricultural plants




The analysis of national health legislation in the field of regulation of the safe use of pesticides and legislation of advanced countries showed that the national regulatory framework is characterized by more stringent requirements. Reasons for inconsistencies between the values of ADI (FAO/WHO) and ADD (DSanPiN 8.8.1.2.3.4-000-2001) are [17]:
1) Using for ADD calculation underthreshold doses, established in toxicological experiment, as opposed to the threshold dose, used for ADI substantiation;
2) Usage in substantiation of ADD value of more “hard” safety coefficients (taking into account possible species sensitivity, long-term effects, high persistence in the environment, etc.);
3) Using of the comprehensive hygienic standardization principle provides for the distribution of the ADD value between food products, drinking water and atmosphere air.

Analysis of MAL values (table 1), approved in Ukraine and MRL of other countries (USA, Japan, Canada, Europe) showed that the total matches of the standards observed only in 10,7 %, complete mismatch — at 60,7 %. It should be noted that 28,6 % of standards were at the same order of numbers.

It was noted that most matches of MAL and MRL values were in wheat: the same values in 24,0 % of cases, similar — in 44,0 % of cases. While the MAL values in apples and grapes, approved in Ukraine, does not coincide with MRL in any of the studied countries, amount of values of the same order are only 18,2 % and 4,1 %, respectively. As for oil crops (corn and soybeans), were found just 8,0 % of matches of Ukrainian MAL with MRL values of other countries, values at the same level — 48,0 % of cases, different — 44,1 %.

Comparative analysis of MAL and MRL values, approved in other countries, found that 30,0–68,3 % of cases in Europe, USA and Japanese standards are the same; in 20,0–40,2 % of cases — close in meanings; and only 11,5–28,3 % — different. When comparing the MRL values of above mentioned countries and Canada was found that groups of same values, the values of the same order and different values make up about a third of each.

The main differences between the studied parameters in Ukraine and in the world are:
1. MRL of fungicides for corn and soybean oils are established only in Ukraine and partially in Canada, for apple, grape and tomato juice — only in Ukraine.
2. More the same values of fungicide MAL and MRL were established for new active substances, provided into the practice of agriculture in recent years (penthiopyrad, sedaxan).
3. In most of cases the MAL values, approved in Ukraine are by 1–2 orders of magnitude (in the case of apples and grapes by 3 orders of magnitude) lower than the corresponding indices of MRL, approved in other countries.
4. The main difference between the MAL and MRL values of fungicides for oilseed is that the values, approved in Ukraine, higher than values, approved in other studied countries (63,6 % of cases — including standards that differ, 44,0 % — of all MRL of these cultures).

Described differences can be explained by different methodological approaches to the substantiation of MAL values. In Ukraine the maximum allowable level is calculated based on the value of residues in harvests of agricultural crops, acceptable daily dose, risk assessment considering acceptable daily intake and daily real intake from all crops in which the substance is registered [18]. In other countries, the value of residues in harvests of crops and estimated values of the relative risks in the results obtained are taking into account primarily [6–9].

Conclusions

1. Overcoming of the mentioned problems requires not only the elimination of internal contradictions in the regulatory frameworks of various countries and international recommendations based on a systematic approach [19] but differentiated approach to the substantiation and approval of standards.

2. Considering belonging of fruits and juices to baby food, the substantiation of MAL values of fungicides should be guided by the principles of comprehensive hygienic standardization, forced in Ukraine [18].

3. High MAL values for oilseeds, approved in Ukraine, need to be revised, which, in turn, requires the improvement of analytical methods for the control of pesticide residues in these cultures.

This article shows the comparative analysis of hygienic standards in food products of active substances belonging to the group of fungicides, in future articles we plan to continue analysis of mentioned problem on groups of herbicides and insecticides.

REFERENCES

1. Law of Ukraine “On State Program of Adaptation of Ukraine's legislation to legislation of European Union”: № 1629-IV. — [Approved 18.03.2004]. — K: Ukrainian Parliament, 2004.

2. Order “On approval of the plans for the implementation of certain legislative acts of the EU developed by Ministry of Health": №1141-p. — [Approved 26.11.2014]. — K: Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, 2014.

3. Ukraine on foreign agricultural markets. How to compensate the loss of the RF market / Alex Pavlenko, Minister of Agrarian Policy [Electronic resource]: Yevropeys'ka pravda, 2015. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://www.eurointegration.com.ua/experts/2015/09/23/7038635/view_print/. — Title from screen.

4. Kapitska K.V. The problems of exports of Ukrainian agricultural products and agricultural aspects of free trade zone EU-Ukraine creation / K.V. Kapitska, V.V. Udovenko [Electronic resource]: Naukovyy ohlyad: XII International Scientific Internet Conference “Scientific Potential in 2016”. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://intkonf.org/kapitska-k-v-udovenko-v-v-problemi-eksportu-silskogospodarskoyi-produk-tsiyi-ukrayini-ta-agrarni-aspekti-stvorennya-zoni-vilnoyi-torgivli-ukrayina-es/. — Title from screen.

5. Actuality of application and hygienic assessment of assortment and rates of application changes of fungicides for vineyards protection in agriculture of Ukraine and Europe / O.P. Vavrinevych, A.M. Antonenko, S.T. Omelchuk [at al.] // International scientific-practical forum of pedagogues, psychologists and medics “October scientific forum'15”, the 15th of October, 2015, Geneva, Switzerland. — P. 197–202.

6. EU — Pesticides database [Electronic resource]: Maximum Residue Levels. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/max_residue_levels/index_en.htm. — Title from screen.

7. Positive List System for Agricultural Chemical Residues in Foods [Electronic resource]: Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) List of Agricultural Chemicals in Foods. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://www.m5.ws001.squarestart.ne.jp/foundation/search.html. — Title from screen.

8. Health Canada [Electronic resource]: Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://pr-rp.hc-sc.gc.ca/mrl-lrm/index-eng.php. — Title from screen.

9. Codex Alimentarius [Electronic resource]: Codex Pesticides Residues in Food Online Database. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/standards/pestres/pesticides/en/. — Title from screen.

10. The list of pesticides and agrochemicals allowed for application in Ukraine. — Official Edition. — K: Yunivest Media, 2014. — 832 p.

11. Mode of action of fungicides [Electronic resource]: FRAC classification on mode of action 2014. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://www.frac.info. — Title from screen.

12. Geograf [Electronic resource]: Geography of world agriculture. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://www.geograf.com.ua/human/school-course/394-geografiya-silskogo-gospodarstva-svitu. — Title from screen.

13. World agriculture: value, intrabranch structure, interbranch relations, agrarian relations. — Electronic data. — Mode of access: http://school.xvatit.com/index.php?title=Світове_сільське_господарство:_значення,_внутрішньогалузева_структура,_міжгалузеві_зв%27язки,_агpарні_відносини. — Title from screen.

14. Acceptable dose, concentration, amounts and levels of pesticides in agricultural raw materials, food, air of working zone, atmosphere air, water reservoirs, soil: DSanPiN 8.8.1.2.3.4.-000-2001: [Approved 20.09.01]. — K.: Ministry of health of Ukraine, 2001. — 245 p.

15. Addition to DSanPiN 8.8.1.2.3.4.-000-2001 № 1-2001. — №67. — 2012.

16. The list of values of hygienic standards and regulations of safe application of chemicals: Resolution of chief state sanitary doctor of Ukraine № 2 [Approved 24.01.2013], № 10 [Approved 17.04.2013], № 12 [Approved 17.06.2013], № 26 [Approved 26.11.2013], № 27 [Approved 18.12.2013], № 5 [Approved 25.01.2014], N97 [Approved 06.03.2014], [Approved 03.03.2015], [Approved 23.04.2015], [Approved 16.06.2015].

17. Stroy A.N. The problem of harmonization of national and international sanitary legislation in the field of hygienic regulation of pesticides application / A.N. Stray // Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference “Actual problems of toxicology, hygiene and analytical chemistry of pesticides and agrochemicals”, 16–17 october 2003. — P. 547–548.

18. Guidelines for the hygienic assessment of new pesticides: MG № 4263-87. — [Approved 13.03.87]. — K.: Ministry of health of USSR, 1988. — 210 p.

19. Hzhehotskyy M.R. The problems of hygienic standards of xenobiotics harmonization in modern preventive toxicology / M.R. Hzhehotskyy, B.M. Shtabskyy, L.M. Shafran // Suchasni problemy toksykolohiyi. — 2011. —№5.— P. 39.

 

Похожие материалы (по тегу)

FaLang translation system by Faboba